Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 5701 - 5720 of 7,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2009, 4:18 pm
Business Development at JD Supra, (@JChristi) Monique Altheim, Brooklyn, NY, attorney, (@molecule18)Jill Windwer, NYC, VP Digital Products and Law.com, (@jwindwer)Mark Astarita, NY/NJ, securities litigator and broker-dealer attorney, (@astarita)Kathleen Scanlon, Long Island, NY, real estate lawyer, (@kasesq94)heckmanpage, Alpharetta, GA, (@heckmanpage) Unfiltered Orange, Austin, Texas, Orange Legal Technologies, (@complexd)Patrick DiDomenico, NYC, lawyer and KM professional, (@lawyerkm)David… [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Anthony Fairclough, Matrix Law
A more thoughtful analysis was offered by commentators such as Camila Batmanghelidjh (founder of the charities The Place To Be and Kids Company) in The Independent and Peter Oborne in The Telegraph. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 3:41 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court Case Name: Hite v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 2:09 am
Links Peter Wainman at Naked Law on the SCL Lecture Laurence Eastham at SCL on Corruption 2.0 SCL Audio Recording of the Lessig Lecture [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 2:16 pm
As none other than Michael Mukasey argued at the time (Padilla v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christine Hurt
  Well, according to the facts alleged in the complaint, there's a lot more there to hang one's partnership hat on than in Holmes v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 1:35 am
If you want an unfashionably positive and upbeat assessment of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, emphasising that TRIPS is not so much a straitjacket which confines the aspirations of the have-nots as a flexible formula that grows with all its users' interests, Professor Peter Yu's article "The Objectives and Principles of the TRIPS Agreement" makes good reading. [read post]
17 Jul 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court dealt a blow to public unions in June,” in Janus v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 11:36 am by Jennifer Davis
Before Bostock: the accidental LGBTQ precedent of Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:03 pm
 The IPKat's Turkish friend and scholar, Mehmet Artemel, has given a pretty thorough review of the UK Intellectual Property Office's recent "Intellectual Asset Management for Universities” on Peter Groves' Ipso Jure weblog here. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
(Hat tip: HobbySpace)Space race v. auctioning: Sam "big advocate of space property rights" Dinkin replies to Prof. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm by azatty
He explained how he had sought and sifted through the case files on Korematsu v. [read post]
On December 10, 2024, the BRPTO issued Ordinance INPI/PR Nº 48 of November 29, 2024, initiating Phase V of the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) program. [read post]