Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 58,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
In the 2013 case of Shelby County v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
The claimant stated that this did not happen. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See Gauthier v. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
See Gauthier v. [read post]
9 Jan 2025, 8:39 pm
1 Jul 2022, 12:40 pm
[In her forceful West Virginia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:59 am
United States, No. 15-6418:Last Term, this Court decided Johnson v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:18 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
The Court also issued an opinion in Voisine v. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
At the International Municipal Lawyer Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in Husted v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:42 am
In Ruby Mann v. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 7:48 pm
Here is how Tymkovich (who, by the way, argued on behalf of the state of Colorado unsuccessfully in Romer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 12:30 pm
Last year’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:12 am
") AC32022 - State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:16 am
Cabe v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 9:09 am
On Friday, October 26, the Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States, filed a supplemental brief urging the Court that the case of Windsor v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation* and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:39 am
One may well suspect that Justice Alito does not hold his predecessor's views on this issue (or, at least, her latest views as manifested in Katz), but, in four Terms, the issue has yet to squarely arise (assuming one doesn't count Chief Justice Roberts's dissent earlier this month in Alabama v. [read post]
