Search for: "House v. House"
Results 5721 - 5740
of 41,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2011, 11:49 am
So when Allied comes to your house, you show them one group of boxes that are to be shipped to the UAE and another group that are to be put into storage. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm
In addition to the Co-Chairs, the Task Force shall consist of the following members: (i) the Secretary of Defense; (ii) the Secretary of Labor; (iii) the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; (iv) the Secretary of Transportation; (v) the Secretary of Education; (vi) the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers; (vii) the Director of the Office of Management and Budget; (viii) the Administrator of the Small Business Administration; (ix) the Director of National Intelligence;… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 12:18 pm
D’Costa v D’Andrea & Ors (HOUSING – RENT REPAYMENT ORDERS – the defence of reasonable excuse) (2021) UKUT 144 (LC) An Upper Tribunal appeal of a rent repayment order. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am
This is the most important privacy damages hearing since the tort of “misuse of private information” was devised by the House of Lords in another MGN case in 2004. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
If it is a housing association, even more so. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 6:28 am
Electronic Arts Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 8:20 pm
Use of the implied license at the Akinson Housing Co-operative in Toronto was scrutinized by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 7:01 am
The police are trying to get out of the case on qualified immunity grounds, but the Court of Appeals will not go there.The case is Penree v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in Agudath Israel of America v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:01 am
Citing Hudock v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:00 am
In Heller’s Gas, Inc. v. [read post]
Agency's enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show "employee's intent"
14 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Agency's enforcing its rule prohibiting misconduct does not require that it show "employee's intent"Matter of Daveiga v City of New York, 2008 NY Slip Op 10222, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThe New York City Housing Authority dismissed Kymel Daveiga from his position as Supervisor of Grounds after he was found to have violated the Authority's policy prohibiting employees from "commit[ting] any . . . violation of the law either on or off duty or… [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 6:12 am
Weeks v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:49 pm
He had also claimed Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 8:56 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:06 pm
” Florida v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Main Street Church of Brigham City v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
In a memorandum opinion in Kersey v. [read post]
