Search for: "In INTEREST OF FEW v. State" Results 5721 - 5740 of 11,572
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
”  Id. at 773.A few years later, in Hurt v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 1:36 am
 The complaints relate to allegations about Mr Topić’s previous job as Director General of the State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
Few defendants can remain confident that they will ultimately manage to evade identification. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 7:34 am by Veridiana Alimonti
This regional process reflects and feeds country-level initiatives that have also gained steam in Latin America in the last few years. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 11:33 am by Will Baude
A few other excerpts below: On judicial power and the "proper party," (with great thanks to Woolhandler and Nelson): A. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 6:30 am by admin
  In the recent cybersquatting case of Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. ll aka Joe Comeau FA1336979 (Nat. [read post]
29 May 2009, 6:32 am
Few issues in U.S. corporate law, however, are as controversial as whether directors should be exposed to damages for their actions or omissions in situations in which they do not have a conflict of interest. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
I keep those printouts for environmental reasons (until expiration), but only when lawsuits are brought within a very few years of each other (such as Nokia v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm by JB
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:25 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Foreigners registered very few marks of their own. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Let’s start with a few basic, non-controversial propositions concerning the default duties of LLC members and managers under the laws of New York and, I would hazard a guess, most if not all other states: Managers of a manager-managed LLC owe fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the LLC and its members. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 10:17 am
There are few more powerful motivators when it comes to trade mark litigation than the thought that one's own name is at stake. [read post]
”[22] While Virginia Pharmacy found that commercial speech is entitled to at least some level of First Amendment protection, the level of judicial review was not articulated until a few years later in the seminal case Central Hudson v. [read post]