Search for: "People v. Part" Results 5721 - 5740 of 25,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2010, 7:24 am by Francis Davey
To recap: the claimant lives in a caravan on land to the North of road which is a part of the public highway, even though it is not itself metaled. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 5:47 am
By making the list of these files identified on Exhibit B to the Complaint part of the public record, Counter-Defendants seek to shame ... [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
In relation to the “right-thinking people” test, Mr Justice Warby (pic) observed that: “It also covers left-thinking people, and those in the middle. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
” He also cited the earlier Court ruling in a similar case, Fletcher v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:50 am by ricelawmd_3p2zve
Example of a Missed Stroke Injury Case In 2019, the New Jersey Law Journal reported on how a $5.1 million settlement was reached in the case of Ryan v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 3:41 am
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent casesGuest post from Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy), summarizing 2017's recent patent decisions. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”* See People v Rose, 72 AD3d 1341** The facts of that case are more fully discussed in a previous decision by the Appellate Division, Ross v Albany County Dist. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 11:23 am by Bill Easton
  Recognizing this burden, and the unfairness of foisting it on an unwilling defendant, the Court of Appeals has repeatedly reversed cases where an affirmative defense was imposed on an unwilling defendant (see e.g., People v Bradley, 88 NY2d 901, 902 [1996] [extreme emotional disturbance]; People v DeGina, 72 NY2d 768, 776-777 [1988] [entrapment]).New York Affirmative DefensesNew York Penal Law Article 40 groups the general affirmative defenses that apply to… [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 1:51 pm
  Here is the notable part of the opinion for Second Amendment fans: Bledsoe, who was nineteen at the time of the purchase, argues that the proscription in § 922(b)(1) on the sale of handguns by federally-licensed dealers to people under twenty-one violates her Second Amendment individual right to keep and bear arms, as recently recognized in District of Columbia v. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 9:06 am
" The Privileges or Immunities Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment passed, of course, after the Civil War. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Ltd ([2008] 1 AC 1), and on the judgment of Lord Neuberger MR in  Imerman v Tchenguiz  ([2010] EWCA Civ 908). [read post]