Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5721 - 5740 of 9,848
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Circuit wrote: An administrative agency is not subject to Article III of the Constitution of the United States [and] so the petitioner would have had no need to establish its standing to participate in the proceedings before the agency. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
City of Cincinnati, 622 F.3d 524, 538 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding, in reviewing a preliminary injunction, that plaintiff had shown a likelihood of success on his claim that a restriction on speech in a nonpublic forum was unconstitutionally vague); United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
In the United States Code, for example, there are exemptions: in food inspection laws, allowing the preparation of food in accordance with religious practices, 7 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm by Brian Price
The moving party bears the burden of showing that no claim has been stated, Hedges v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:09 am by Joy Waltemath
He contended that his case was against Microsoft directly — which allegedly controlled MS Libya — for violating federal and state discrimination laws after he returned to the United States. [read post]
By contrast, the work of a city council or board, in most of the towns and cities of the United States, regularly deals with decisions affecting small groups and individuals. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 8:40 am by Matthew Crow
The goal of his own work then is to change not only our understanding of the origins of British North America and the United States but our sense of what it is to study and write about these things. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am by Jane Chong
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:08 am
  In Cline – answering questions of state law certified to it by the United States Supreme Court – the Oklahoma Supreme Court had nothing but good things to say about off-label use.Cline was somewhat different than Abbottin its facts. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:41 am by Joel R. Brandes
    In West v Dobrev, 2013 WL 5813749 (10th Cir, 2013) Petitioner West, a lawyer, was a citizen of Romania and the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 11:23 am by admin
In addition to the above, the Court also reasoned that in the United States the federal judicial opposition for indirect purchaser suits (emanating from Illinois Brick) has in many cases been circumvented by “repealer statutes” at the state level and that academic or “doctrinal” thinking had now also shifted toward an increased recognition of indirect purchaser class action rights. [read post]