Search for: "Goldstein "
Results 5741 - 5760
of 5,876
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2006, 12:52 pm
Earlier this year, they added young SCOTUS superstar Tom Goldstein to their line-up. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 4:51 pm
The firm, Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP, created their "brochure, corresponding web site and ads, ... to separate [their] law firm from the competition by stating [their] values in a simple, clear and succinct manner and ... with a professional sense of humor demonstrated by using the nationally renowned New Yorker cartoons. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 7:30 pm
As Lyle Denniston reported this afternoon, amidst the hubbub over the Supreme Court's shrinking docket—Linda Greenhouse in the New York Times this morning and Tom Goldstein's detailed commentary on Nov. 30th—the Supreme Court took five new cases today. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 10:08 am
She mentions a SCOTUSBlog post by Tom Goldstein (which seems to have provided some of the initial idea for her own article); she also casually mentions a blog post by Orin Kerr. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 3:08 pm
After the Frisch-Goldstein drama, Frisch was charged in Oregon with stalking and telephone harassment in a matter unrelated to Goldstein. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
Or maybe the Justices read Tommy Goldstein's SCOTUSblog post and realized they'd better start filling up their docket. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 3:48 am
" In The New York Sun, Joseph Goldstein reports that "Spitzer Argues For Race-Based School Admission. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:02 pm
" Goldstein: no.] [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 9:09 am
Also, two posts of note at SCOTUS Blog; first, the state of the Court's docket by Tom Goldstein, and an expanded podcast on the shrinking docket issue. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 6:45 am
Tom Goldstein is a bit peeved at how late the Court is granting certiorari. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
"List of Candidates for State's Top Court Goes to Spitzer for an Early Decision": Joseph Goldstein has this article today in The New York Sun. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 7:24 pm
Over at SCOTUSblog, posts by Tom Goldstein and Marty Lederman highlight how light the Supreme Court docket is this Term and ask whether there "are any particular categories of cases -- defined by subject-matter, reasons-for-grant, or otherwise -- to which the Court is being insufficiently attentive. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 2:58 pm
"An Update on the State of the Docket": At "SCOTUSblog," Tom Goldstein has this interesting post about the state of the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Goldstein argued that the support of respondents' position by every major patent bar association further emphasized this fact. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 8:04 am
Goldstein referred to experts who had testified that the Teleflex patent was not obvious, the chief justice asked: "Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 2:13 pm
In an unrelated case, Tom Goldstein is counsel of record on this newly-filed Reply Brief in the case of Gilmore v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 2:26 pm
Mr Goldstein [for Teleflex]: “[The CAFC has had decades to look at this to try and elaborate a standard. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 12:32 pm
GOLDSTEIN: You get -- CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: I mean, the least insightful person you can find? [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:33 am
" Goldstein's defense of the experts got lost in the ensuing laughter. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
" [Goldstein is a contributor to Legal Times.] [read post]
