Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5741 - 5760
of 13,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 1:38 pm
They think they’re doing the right thing. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm
Some have suggested that this opens the door to an arrangement between the now effective Trans Pacific Partnership and the United States, something the Trump administration signalled might be plausible as early as October 2018 (e.g., here). [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:09 am
We’re omnipotent. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 4:32 am
And patentees only win 25% of their litigated cases - 75% of the time you're sued, you're right to refuse to pay. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:35 pm
See, e.g., In re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Prod. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 7:38 am
There is no reason for disciplinary records to be purged after, e.g., 5 or 7 years. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 7:06 pm
("Res ipsa my loquitur, baby.... [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 1:45 pm
We're looking forward to our visit to the West Coast this week, which will give us the opportunity to escape from the cold. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:18 pm
See, e.g., Mark I, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 5:58 pm
Sure, antitrust will force you to learn some economics because the law itself has incorporated economic concepts (see, e.g. the Merger Guidelines). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:25 am
Hardly sensible and no improvement over the old rule: "you're under no duty to do the impossible i.e. guard against every 1-in-a-million risk you create". [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 12:41 pm
See, e.g., “Another Attempted Water Escape Fails” (June 14, 2018) (collecting prior cases). [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:01 am
See, e.g. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 8:14 am
See, e.g., Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2024, 2:44 pm
This is significant because, for individuals who have lived illegally in the U.S. for 180 days or more, exiting the country triggers certain bars on re-entry. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 8:37 am
However, the following exceptions apply: The amount of loan forgiveness will not be affected if the employer was unable to rehire a fired employee (e.g., the employee refuses to come back to work) or find a qualified replacement for such fired employee. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 3:58 pm
(for previous TOTM takes on Section 5, see, e.g. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 8:51 am
And while they disagree on what counts as coercion of religious practice (e.g., does being exposed to prayer, and socially pressured to stand and remain silent, at a high school graduation ceremony that isn’t legally required, qualify as coercion?) [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:58 pm
In case you're interested in the bottom line, the data for legal academics is similar to the results of other studies: law professors give a lot more money to Democrats than to Republicans. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:57 am
See, e.g., Miranda v. [read post]
