Search for: "Samsung"
Results 5741 - 5760
of 6,718
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference
30 Sep 2022, 8:21 am
Apple v Samsung changed perceptions. [read post]
19 May 2013, 1:06 am
Whether it’s Galaxy Ace or iPhone, Motorola cannot discriminate between Samsung or Apple. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
So far, Apple and Microsoft haven't done any of that, but a company they own jointly with three other industry players, the Rockstar Consortium, recently added Google as a defendant to a Samsung lawsuit.In the United States (and other jurisdictions, such as the UK), operating companies suing competitors over patents they implement in their own products are in a far better position to obtain injunctions (including ITC import bans) than those who don't. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:23 am
According to a source cited by the FCC, as of 2013 all of Samsung’s “flagship smartphone models” had such sensors on board, as did a couple of Sony models. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:19 am
Huawei filed more than 3,500 patent applications (more than any other company, with Samsung a close second) last year with the European Patent Office alone, and is the number 5 patent filer with the United States Patent & Trademark Office.You can actually see the number of European patent applications, with only the first digit being hidden (but easy to infer from the other parts of the column chart), behind Huawei's IP Chief Alan fan in the picture the company provided along with… [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 6:04 am
Samsung had some success at the PTAB, but later, when Huawei sued Verizon, the U.S. telecommunications carrier "received a total of six discretionary denials from the USPTO -- the agency refused to consider Verizon's challenges on their merits. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:07 am
Skyhook alleged that Google (despite negotiations pertaining to a possible cooperation) bullied two major Android OEMs (Samsung and Motorola) out of partnerships with Skyhook in order to promote its own Google Location service, which Skyhook claims infringes on some of its patents. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:11 pm
Those patent holders--and several dozen others, among them Ericsson--won't sue Daimler over 4G patents, however, as the Mercedes maker took an Avanci pool license that also became known last month.Last year, Ericsson filed infringement claims against Samsung on New Year's Day, and won a settlement in the spring.Apple's license agreements with Nokia and InterDigital haven't been renewed in about five years, making it a possibility that we'll see a third wave of Nokia… [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 7:33 am
My problems are mostly at the level right below Huawei and Qualcomm:I would normally assume that companies like Ericsson, Nokia, Samsung, and LG are roughly on an equal footing (Ericsson probably being the number one among them)--to give you a ballpark figure, I would expect each of them to hold around 10% of the relevant patents. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:18 pm
IP law is riddled with legendary pairings (be harmonious or discordant or both) - Hatch and Waxman, Apple and Samsung, Ginbsurg (Happy Birthday!) [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 12:10 pm
However, Google’s Android operating system quickly gained popularity thanks in part to partnerships with Samsung, HTC and other hardware manufacturers. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 11:37 am
I'll try to find out more about this.On Friday Vice President Almunia gave a speech at Fordham's Competition Law Institute Annual Conference in New York and mentioned that "Samsung has sent [the Commission] a set of commitments seeking to address [its] concerns" and announced a market test: "We will formally market test these proposed commitments with other market participants in the coming weeks." [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:16 am
This particular policy brief discusses the recent Samsung and Motorola cases, in which the Commission identified the concern that injunctions could be used anti-competitively to exclude competing products from the market or to impose onerous licensing terms, even if licensees are willing to take a licence on FRAND terms. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 12:55 am
Last year Microsoft also sued Samsung, but that was a contract (as opposed to infringement) case, and it was settled recently (also before any ruling).I guess Google will lend some support to Kyocera with respect to software patents that would be infringed by all Android devices should Microsoft's allegations be true.I used to believe for a long time that Microsoft had a patent portfolio especially in connection with operating system technologies that would really enable it to win… [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Previously, she was Head of Policy Strategy and Legal Counsel at Samsung. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:51 am
The decision of the ITC -- one of the FTC's sister agencies -- to order an import ban against older iPhones and iPads over a Samsung standard-essential patent and Google's continued pursuit of injunctive relief against Apple raise serious issues and show that a lot more work needs to be done to combat SEP abuse before the focus can shift to PAEs. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 10:18 am
A company like Apple or Samsung has to deal with numerous NPE cases in parallel, so one more wouldn't make a difference--but Ford is much smaller, and has much less expertise in the field of cellular SEP litigation. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am
Samsung obviousness issue, on which the en banc Federal Circuit overruled the panel decision (which had held slide-to-unlock to be obvious) without briefing. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
It is, when they embark on cross-licences as is what had been happening with people like Huawei, then they get a certain value but then they are getting mostly done through the cross-licensing effect, but as their interest in mobile phones has declined because they missed a trick in the market and they got overtaken by Huawei, Apple, Samsung and so on, they exploit [he means through making products] the patents less and they have an opportunity -- and this is in the evidence, the judge… [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:01 pm
Mosseff: Samsung v. [read post]
