Search for: "Stephens v. State" Results 5741 - 5760 of 6,333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:32 pm by Anthony Gaughan
For instance, they describe a a short but telling November 2017 exchange between Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Stephen Breyer, and Scott Gant (counsel for the Department of the Interior) in the case of Patchak v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm by Mark Walsh
Amy Howe has this blog’s main report of the argument in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
5 May 2012, 2:21 am by Tyson Snow
A few other tips from a presentation designed to make lawyers more comfortable with social media and the review process: State bars can only regulate commercial speech. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 3:07 am by Lyle Denniston
   They lost in the Supreme Court in a 5-to-4 decision in 1973 (Gilligan v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 5:30 pm
Although the courts uniformly state that intent controls, where a stock bequest is involved, they differ as to the appropriate principles to apply in ascertaining the testator's intent. [read post]