Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 8,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2012, 3:59 am
In Central Bureau of Investigation,Hyderabad v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:17 am
., Giberson blog here.Happily, this week Judge William Canby (above, back row, second from right) gets the Ninth back on track in an admirable new Fourth Amendment decision on computer searches, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 10:37 am
Moving on to the national plane, the first judgment this author is aware of where a Spanish Court ordered a permanent injunction in a situation where no acts of infringement or even “imminent” infringement had been established is the judgment of 17 May 2006 (Warner-Lambert, Geodecke and Pfizer v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:34 am
The employer’s motion for summary judgment was granted (Partin v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 5:35 am
The case, Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace, IFPTE Local 2001 v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 5:06 pm
The style of the case is "Yolanda Luna v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:49 pm
In Jacobson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:55 pm
Kennedy based her decision on well-settled, albeit 20th Century, California law which lays out a broad array of considerations to help distinguish between employees and contractors. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:53 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada is examining this issue within the context of libel in the Crookes v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 12:32 am
In Doe v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 10:54 am
They are very familiar in the antitrust community — Alfred Kahn in New York v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 4:32 pm
Of late, there have been some cases in other jurisdictions where judges have had to recuse themselves from cases for having publicly stated their views on the policy issues at stake beforehand.Update: In the comments section, V. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 7:21 am
See Sony Computer Entertainment America Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 6:42 am
The appeals court’s decision follows those in the Third and Seventh Circuits (Rollins v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 2:17 am
Neither do they lay the foundation for a rights-based allocation of limited resources, which in my view is the only justifiable mechanism for deciding on priority in the context of the provision of medical services. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 11:45 pm
Renaud v. 200 Convention Center Ltd. dba Flyaway, 102 Nev. 500, 728 P.2d 445 (1986). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 8:00 am
(State of New York v. [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 7:48 am
The decision in question is Riegel v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:54 am
[A footnote lays out the details, quoting the State's brief. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:10 am
Asser’s receipt of the Nobel Peace Prize, as well as articles on Brussels I and internet; conflict of laws, the acquired rights directives and transfer of seagoing vessels; the Kiobel v Shell case. [read post]
