Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2019, 4:58 pm
In that case, Ziglar v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
In Rossum v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 4:29 pm
In the case of Alexis v. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:40 am
LSUC, SOCAN v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:33 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 9:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:37 am
Ideology v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:20 pm
In the recent case Gatto v. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 2:47 pm
Since I wrote on this topic last October, a federal district court ruled that AB 51 (seeking to ban mandatory workplace arbitration) was unenforceable, a state appellate court issued a decision restricting third-party discovery (Aixtron, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:30 am
VIP Plastic Packaging Pty Ltd v B.M.W. [read post]
12 Aug 2017, 8:33 pm
Before Brown v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 11:31 am
But in 1911, the Court of Criminal Appeals carved out a narrow exception to this general rule in Battles v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99) United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
– battle between designer ‘Hidden Eloise’ and Paperchase (Class 99) United States US General Should USA black list itself on its Special 301 List? [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
The end result of that litigation was that both parties agreed there was a contract between them and that it was governed by the law of the state of Pennsylvania (where it had been litigated). [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As Jefferson later emphasized to the Virginia jurist Spencer Roane, who was doing battle in the press with Chief Justice John Marshall over the court’s opinion in the McCulloch v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
Const., Amdt. 5; Bolling v. [read post]
