Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 5761 - 5780 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am by Kali Borkoski
Neeley v NameMedia Inc, et al (5:09-cv-05151)(11-2558) Is a fully briefed Eighth Circuit appeal that will be ignored by the United States Courts because of being pro se and IFP. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:55 pm by Paul D. Knothe
  Although this opinion is not binding on California courts, it was authored by then-Judge Samuel Alito, who is now a justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 3:15 pm by Andrew Frisch
Nevertheless, both the district court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit concluded that the expert testimony was sufficient to establish that damages resulting from the “overbuilder” theory of injury were measurable on a classwide basis. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Ray Dowd
Thus, once a copyright owner has shown use of the copyrighted work, the burden of proving that the use was authorized falls squarely on the defendant. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:55 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
SCHIAVELLI; 08-CV-931 (NGG)(JO);  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 May 2022, 6:01 am by Shayan Karbassi
The talks first began in early 2021 between the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, China and Iran. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Stephen Halbrook
" New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
EO 107's mandated closure of all shooting ranges in the State thus unquestionably burdens conduct protected by the Second Amendment…. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:59 pm by Michael O'Hear
The court relies almost entirely on statutory interpretation cases from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]