Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5761 - 5780
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 7:42 am
” Assistant to the Solicitor General Ginger Anders, representing the United States and supporting Heimeshoff, stood up next. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
United States it was both. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:10 pm
One of the landmark cases in which such requirements were affirmed, Crawford v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:47 pm
(See United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 2:08 pm
The United States filed a brief supporting Heimeshoff. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 12:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 4:58 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:43 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware found that ARRIS failed to meet its burden of showing contempt by clear and convincing evidence and declined to hold SeaChange in contempt. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:18 pm
(“SeaChange”) in contempt ofa permanent injunction order .The United States District Court for the District ofDelaware found that ARRIS failed to meetits burden of showing contempt by clearand convincing evidence and declinedto hold SeaChange in contempt. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
After all, as a circuit judge wrote in 2009, “[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States for almost 20 years, and the Sentencing Commission for almost 10 years, have pleaded with the judiciary committees of Congress to do something about the serious injustices that these long, mandatory minimum sentences impose – to no avail. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 7:57 am
Post Submitted by Kirsten Hotchkiss, US Coordinator, Labor Law Plus™ Since the recent United States Supreme Court decision in Italian Colors v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:48 am
Aug. 26, 2013), the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
UK decision actually states in full [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:19 am
Comparatively, municipal bond funds domiciled in the United States are allowed to use only about half as much leverage as employed by the UBS funds. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
Institutional Architecture of Law and Governance: The United States and Law Making--The States and the People; Popular referendums. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:17 am
The focus of the case is location – and, what is meant by an "offer to sell . . . within the United States" under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:01 am
One aspect of the ACA is the envisioned effect of the United States Preventive Services Task Force (here’s the USPSTF’s website) role in evaluating screening methods. [read post]
