Search for: "Bailey v. Bailey" Results 561 - 580 of 1,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2008, 5:29 am
The limitation period had expired.Madam Justice Arnold-Bailey disagreed. [read post]
Although the change was reversed, it created more work for lawyers given the period of prohibition before R v Bailey was successful. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 5:58 am by Susan Brenner
  (For more on the facts and the court’s decision in the Bailey case, check out this prior post.) [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:47 pm
Providence Health and Services Alaska spokeswoman Crystal Bailey confirmed that Bolan had died. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am by Lyle Denniston
Kentucky on required legal advice to clients when they are considering guilty pleas that may lead to their deportation from the United States, and Bailey v. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
In reversing in the interest of justices, the Court wroteas defendant correctly contends, the prosecutor improperly vouched for the credibility of the People's witnesses during both his opening and closing statements (see People v LaDolce, 196 AD2d 49, 57; see generally People v Bailey, 58 NY2d 272, 277-278). [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 3:16 pm
Listen to Podcast 65: Carl Gardner on the ECHR case, Hirst v United Kingdom No 2. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:59 am by Melissa L. Greipp
Mitch Bailey and Jacob Heuett Congratulations to all the participants in the competition. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 12:09 pm by Seth Waxman
Both cases arose from the Supreme Court’s 1995 decision in Bailey v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 12:27 am by Shaheen Rahman
There have been a number of developments since we last blogged on this issue: First, in R(Bailey And Others) V Brent London Borough Council & All Souls College (Interested Party)  & Ehrc (Intervener) [2011] Ewca Civ 1586, The appellants failed to overturn the dismissal of their application for judicial review of a local authority’s decision to close half its public libraries. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:52 am by B.W. Barnett
  The majority opinion reaches its conclusion that the variance is immaterial by misinterpreting the Court of Criminal Appeals’ opinion in Bailey v. [read post]