Search for: "Cole v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP may have centred on rights of individuals, but its ownership and teaching is likely to become ever more collaborative and collective.The editors state the need for sharing best practice as a key driver for this book. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 10:37 am
Two years later, in McDonald v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Parties The Complainant is Facebook Inc. of Palo Alto, California, the United States of America, represented by Heller Ehrman LLP, the United States of America. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 4:11 pm
"State Rep. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
GUY COLE, JR., Circuit Judge. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 6:41 pm
WE THE PEOPLE from Georgia Justice on Vimeo.This is a video that discussed Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery v. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
In the London Review of Books, but behind a paywall, are a review of Entick v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 9:01 am
IANAL, but my personal view was that SB 187 did not provide enough discretion on sentencing to comply with the Supreme Court's decision in Miller v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Korematsu v. the United States : World War II Japanese-American internment camps. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 6:20 am
Gonzalez BRONX COUNTYDamages Medicaid Lien May Not Be Nullified by Stating Settlement Relates Only to Pain, Suffering Chamorro v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am
Cole, 2011 U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Henrichsen, Henrichsen Law Group, PLLC, Jacksonville, FL, Victoria Blanche Kroell, Cole Scott & Kissane, PA, Jacksonville, FL, for Plaintiff-Appellant. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
NMCCA today released its published opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:03 pm
Doe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:56 pm
This category seeks to address the facts at issue in Kerry v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:30 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Court Erred in Applying 18-Level Enhancement in Re-Entry Case United States v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:38 am
Discrimination Although many states prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation, federal courts generally hold that Title VII does not (e.g., Jantz v Emblem Health, SDNY, 2012). [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 1:51 am
Cooey v. [read post]
