Search for: "DAVIS v. LITTLE"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In my column today, I explore what might be learned from the decision by the House of Representatives last week and the seemingly imminent (as of this writing) decision of the Senate this week to pass a bill that seems on its face to directly violate the clear text of the Constitution. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 5:17 pm
The elaboration that "the intent of a questioner is relevant only if it could affect a reasonable declarant's expectations" is, I think, the best way of making sense of a rather confusing aspect of the opinion in Davis v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
In the 1999 case of Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 2:08 pm
The justices granted review in Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:24 pm
The motion to strike was denied.The March 29 decision in Davis v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 2:26 pm
Judges Duncan and Davis had little sympathy for plaintiff. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:53 am
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Miller v Associated Newspapers heard 21 to 25 May 2012 (Sharp J) SKA v CRH, heard 10 and 11 July 2012 (Nicola Davies J) Lord Ashcroft v Foley heard 20 July 2012 (Eady J) [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
As other commentators reported, Roberts seemed more than a little out of touch with the world outside the Marble Palace.But this year, he conveniently shifted the register away from quaint court practices and toward external threats that have now made Judge Davies’s experience an everyday occurrence.He seemed to point fingers almost everywhere, including at public officials who “regrettably have engaged in recent attempts to intimidate judges—for example,… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 3:48 am
The bulk of the court’s decision turned on whether UMW “exercise[d] substantial control over both the harasser and the context in which the known harassment occurs,” as required to establish Title IX liability under the Supreme Court’s 1999 decision in Davis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:18 am
Joel Tenenbaum filed a final brief on Feb. 18, 2010 in Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
A little over a decade ago, Justice Scalia delivered the judgment of the Court—writing for himself and three other justices in Vieth v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:00 am
Davis, 391 S.W.2d 658 (Tenn. 1965); Gritzner v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm
Rebekah Brooks received a little tabloid treatment firsthand, with the Daily Mail’s publication of pictures from her holiday in South Africa. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 7:58 am
Davis reversing the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:07 pm
Here's a look at handful of hot-topic items we've seen on JD Supra in this last week of June:- SCOTUS Overturns California's "Violent Video Games" LawFrom Davis Wright Tremaine: "The Supreme Court's June 27, 2011, decision in Brown v. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:03 am
Federal Election Commission, by Charles Davis, Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Here, Grutter v. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm
Neither Davis LJ nor Underhill LJ in H accepted that there was a right to settled or permanent accommodation protected by or within the reach of Article 8 and, insofar as Sir Terence Etherton in H was relying on an obiter statement of Goss J in R(HA) v Ealing LBC (2016) PTSR 16 to find that one of the local authorities’ groups within its housing allocations polices fell “within the scope of family life protected by article 8”, that was not followed by Lewison LJ… [read post]
