Search for: "Does 1 - 33" Results 561 - 580 of 6,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Mr Justice Mitting seems to be of the opinion that the exclusion of Article 1 of the e-commerce Directive does not make sense, although he does not make the point in relation to the claim for compensation but in relation to the claim for injunctive relief. [read post]
Recent data from HireVue shows that while 100% of hiring leaders consider DE&I “extremely relevant” or “very relevant,” only 33% rank taking action on it a top priority.1 So how can leaders take the crucial step from words of solidarity to measurable outcomes? [read post]
Recent data from HireVue shows that while 100% of hiring leaders consider DE&I “extremely relevant” or “very relevant,” only 33% rank taking action on it a top priority.1 So how can leaders take the crucial step from words of solidarity to measurable outcomes? [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 9:21 am by Brittan J. Bush
Nonetheless, it does serve as a reminder that when a party recognizes an omission or mistake in an instrument affecting mineral rights, a party should not immediately opt for an easy fix via a notarial act of correction. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 11:03 am by Venkat
July 1, 2011) New Jersey's cell phone driving statute suffered a serious blow at the hands of the New Jersey appeals court, which held that the statute does not prohibit a driver from "activating" or "dialing" a cell phone equipped with a hands-free device. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
., 2017 SCC 33 (36616) While s. 4 of the B.C. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:06 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
All documents referred to shall be [...](4) Any part of a party's appeal case which does not meet the requirements in paragraph 2 is to be regarded as an amendment, unless the party demonstrates that this part was admissibly raised and maintained in the proceedings leading to the decision under appeal. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 5:15 am
Take a look.The BBC has a country by country analysis of the election results and we show below the fairly final but still officially provisional EU Election Results for all 27 Countries who elected 736 Members of Parliament (MEPs) representing 492 million European inhabitants (there are 375 million eligible voters):Provisional 11 June 2009 at 11:26 CEST EPP PES ALDE UEN GREENS/ EFA GUE/ NGL IND/ DEM Others Total BE 6 5 5 0 3 0 0 3… [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:16 am by Roel van Woudenberg
In decision T 315/03 (relating to what has become Rule 28(1)(d) EPC) theBoard fully acknowledged the Administrative Council’s competence to interpretArticle 53(a) EPC by amendment to the Implementing Regulations based onArticle 33(1)(c) EPC without being limited in this regard by an interpretation ofthe Article set forth in earlier case law.10. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:20 pm
Ed. 2d 94 (2001), "a Fourth Amendment search does not occur ... unless 'the individual manifested a subjective expectation of privacy in the object of the challenged search,' and 'society [is] willing to recognize that expectation as reasonable.'" Id. at 33 (quoting California v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 5:47 am
Also, when review under the Fourth Amendment affords defendant the relief he seeks, the state constitutional claim does not need to be reached. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Second Circuit affirmed Judge Kaplan’s ruling that the rating agencies cannot be held liable as “underwriters” under the ’33 Act. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Source: Tax Foundation Alabama 39 20 30 48 15 12 Alaska 2 25 1 5 23 35 Arizona 27 17 19 47 5 13 Arkansas 46 40 40 44 26 34 California 49 31 49 43 14 17 Colorado 18 16 14 38 12 40 Connecticut 47 29 43 30 50 23 Delaware 11 50 41 2 9 3 Florida 4 6 1 22 11 2 Georgia 33 8 38 29 24 38 Hawaii 38 14 47 24 16 26 Idaho 21 26 23 26 4 48 Illinois 36 39 13 36 45 42 Indiana 10 18 15 12 2 11 Iowa 45 48 42 19 39 33 Kansas 28 34 21 31 20 15 Kentucky 23 27 17 14 35 47 Louisiana 44… [read post]
1 May 2011, 10:09 am by emagraken
For some issues, the need for honesty being the clearest example, no different standard can or does apply to a lay litigant. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 5:33 am by Bill Marler
For those that are prosecuted, does the punishment fit the crime? [read post]