Search for: "JOHNSON v. VIRGINIA" Results 561 - 580 of 767
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm by John Elwood
Johnson, which has gained some media attention. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP)   Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46)   United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd… [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 4:54 pm by INFORRM
On 10 June 2021 Griffiths J heard a committal application in the case of Bonnier v Johnson. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The final tranches of documents were released from Virginia Giuffre’s 2015 defamation case following their unsealing last week, including the depositions of Epstein, Maxwell and Giuffre. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
It’s hard to tell, but Johnson v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 2:52 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas's dissent in Virginia v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
Two important capital cases out of Nevada are noted John Bejarano v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Reports of Criminal Trials in the Circuit, State and United States Courts, Held in Richmond, Virginia 1 v. (1851) Howison, Robert R. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
Eutsler, 276 F.2d 455, 460 (4th Cir. 1960), devoted two paragraphs to a similar holding under Virginia law.Under most state's laws, however, the answer isn't as cut and dried as the Ezagui and Eutsler courts make it out to be. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
Robins Co., 738 P.2d 1210, 1227-28 (Kan. 1987) (applied to medical device); Johnson v. [read post]