Search for: "King v. State"
Results 561 - 580
of 6,138
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2019, 6:30 am
King who joined the Supreme Court less than four years after King’s death. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
United States. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:19 am
Richter, who is Partner at King & Spalding. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:22 am
While Jani-King might ultimately be correct that the franchise agreement and manuals did not contain sufficient controls over the day-to-day work of franchisees to make them “employees” under state law, either way, it was possible to make that determination on a class-wide basis. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:34 am
With two competing decisions, the matter made its way to the Supreme Court where the matter, as King v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
From McQueen v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:06 pm
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Randhawa & Anor, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 2599 (22 October 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Wandsworth v Whibley [2008] EWCA Civ 1259 (14 November 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Farraj & Anor v King’s Healthcare NHS Trust & Anor [2008] EWHC 2468 (QB) (17 October 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Muscat v Health Professions Council [2008] EWHC 2798 (Admin)… [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 12:04 pm
A case from the Third Department last week illustrates that is simply not the case - Kings Mall, LLC v Wenk, 2007 NY Slip Op 05811. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
The judge stated that “it is quite plain in my view that it is a “lifestyle” interview” and accepted that he had “no authority in that capacity to make statements”. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 9:02 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:09 am
The Kings County, New York, Supreme Court ruled that plaintiff failed to state a cause of action pursuant to the New York Court of Appeals’ decision in Waters v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 6:12 am
King — but I am not even allowed to read it. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 8:16 am
” United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
In the latest case to challenge elements of the Affordable Care Act (“Act”), the United States Supreme Court in a six-to-three vote, ruled on June 25, 2015 in King v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 10:04 am
Peabody Western Coal Company (tribal hiring preference) King Mountain Tobacco Company, INC. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 7:01 am
(ret.) in the on-going Alcotest litigation in State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 10:43 am
On December 14, 2010, the Court of Appeals published its per curiam opinion in Watts v Michigan Multi-King, No. 293185. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 6:50 pm
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 8:45 pm
Wentworth Originations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
