Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 561 - 580 of 1,488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 2:46 am
Similarly, on the notification issue, it was held that the judge's conclusions regarding the construction of the notification clause had been correct, and, relying on the recent decision in HLB Kidsons (A Firm) v Lloyds Underwriters (2008) EWCA Civ 1206, that he was correct to apply an objective test as to whether the dispute had reached a stage where notification was required. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Smith, Lauren Fontana, Susannah William Pollvogt & Tanya Washington, Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Constitutional Rights of Children in Support of Petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 9:08 am
The Impact of Domestic Veto Players on Compliance with WTO Rulings Cale Horne, Kellan Robinson, & Megan Lloyd, The Relationship between Contributors’ Domestic Abuses and Peacekeeper Misconduct in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations Arthur A Goldsmith, Out of Africa? [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 1:06 pm by Joe Consumer
About two weeks later, the Republican State Leadership Committee put $950,000 into independent campaign ads supporting the retention of Lloyd Karmeier, a Republican Illinois Supreme Court justice. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm by Simon Gibbs
Hopefully the decision of His Honour Judge Kay QC in Lloyd Fraser (Ply Chain) v Hutton (click for judgment) (13/9/11, Luton County Court) will help to reduce the scope for any argument on this subject. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Robinson v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15 Nov 2018. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
  However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:26 am by CMS
The justices were also divided as to how to answer this question, with Lord Kerr and Lady Hale agreeing with Lord Carnwath; Lords Lloyd-Jones, Reed and Sumption declining to give a view; and Lord Wilson dissenting. [read post]