Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 561 - 580
of 14,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2015, 11:04 am
But somehow you didn’t blow enough air into the machine. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 10:01 pm
One said: “We can’t fight them. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 7:02 am
Remember that your registration only has to coverthe class heading, it doesn’t have to have the exact wording. 2. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:48 am
I mean, wouldn't that explain a lot? [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 6:16 am
(Meadows has denied that he was involved in one of the alleged overt acts and that another misstates the Georgia official to whom he sent a message.)The removal issue matters greatly to both sides. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:00 am
Fame for dilution is either/or, while confusion is a matter of degree. [read post]
8 Feb 2018, 11:12 pm
Trade mark matters involving Polo/Lauren seem to crop up in many jurisdictions, with varying results. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 9:26 am
” [I have to admit, I don't get why the difference should matter to the descriptive fair use analysis. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
D argued he hadn’t used it as a mark, but the position of the logo on the website is where the consumer would expect it to be. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:43 am
Former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella has been transferred and settled into a medium security federal prison in Illinois. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 12:27 am
Case T‑394/10, Elena Grebenshikova v OHIM, Volvo Trademark Holding AB intervening, is a fascinating decision of the General Court of the European Union (Third Chamber) on 5 December. [read post]
6 Jan 2019, 8:04 pm
The USPTO refused to grant Brunetti’s application to register the mark — finding that the mark “comprises immoral * * * or scandalous matter” and thus cannot be registered under Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
And so the Board reversed the refusal to register.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: I wouldn't call this opinion a jewel of clarity. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
From here you can edit the entry, add attendees, and/or mark the matter as billable. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 5:51 pm
I am reading once more Jeremy Waldron’s wonderful book, Law and Disagreement (1999), the complementary volume to his equally worthy Seeley Lectures, published as The Dignity of Legislation (1999) (for the record, I don’t share Waldron’s thoughts—or those of Larry Kramer or Mark Tushnet for that matter—on judicial review), which is relevant to several things I’m working on, but especially toward completing a couple of reviews of recent… [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 2:49 pm
appeared first on Mendik Matters. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 6:13 pm
It’s easy to say that safe havens don’t matter if everywhere is a safe haven. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
It didn’t “adopt” a similar mark at all; it compared its products to those of APT. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 8:08 am
Such an agreement says in effect "we don't believe that there is a likelihood of confusion, please take our word for it. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 10:01 am
If the statute has certain factors in it, and it doesn’t have other factors in it, and the court considers extraneous matters, isn’t that subject to appellate review? [read post]
