Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,804
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
Background Few people would demur from Parliament’s acknowledgement of the vital importance of education. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 4:36 pm
It is inevitable…that there will always be some people who can and will ‘join up the dots’, although that is not to imply that they can publish their conclusion. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
Lord Sumption in particular had misgivings about using the law to “enforce basic decency and courtesy”. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am
Oh, lord no. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 12:21 am
It was decided in the House of Lords in 1985, in a case called Street v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
A judge has barred journalists from naming four people mounting a fresh High Court Brexit challenge in reports on the case. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
But I think it’s important that people understand why this issue is an issue at all. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:07 am
Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissented. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Lady Hale (Lord Carnwath agreeing) dissented in relation to A. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 9:44 am
In the role of chief justice, Alito seemed quite comfortable with his opening declaration, as if he might enjoy one day being the real one: “We will hear argument in the case of Lord and Lady Montague, Lord and Lady Capulet v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
” 15.57 Eadie QC discusses the possibility of a single line Act of Parliament, which he says created a difficulty for the respondents as it makes no sense in the context where Parliament has put that very question to the people by way of a referendum. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
The Lord Chief Justice expressed concern at the withdrawal of legal aid for private law family disputes during his annual press conference. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
The Lord Advocate replies that this is a fair observation. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 9:54 am
As it happens my law school is housed in a building named for John Lord O'Brian, a one-time United States Attorney most famous for prosecuting Eugene V. [read post]
