Search for: "People v Mitchell"
Results 561 - 580
of 626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
Justice Gorsuch's majority opinion in the Bostock case, while purporting to be based solely on the plain meaning of the text, actually relies on a host of other considerations, including prior case law, law professor type hypotheticals, dictionaries (which Congress may or may not have been aware of), and just under the surface but still there, an obvious (and in my view correct) hostility to the negative consequences that would result from allowing employers to fire… [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Mitchell N. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
The Legal Aid Society; Real Estate Board of New York; New York State Tenants & Neighbors Coalition, Inc. et al.; Community Housing Improvement Program of New York Inc. et al.; Maria del Carmen Arroyo et al.; Rent Stabilization Association of New York City, Inc.; Office of Manhattan Borough President; Urban Justice Center; Mitchell-Lama Residents Coalition, amici curiae. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 8:55 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 10:20 am
In Roverano v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:35 am
[Former Nixon Attorney General John] Mitchell has been working on raising some money. . . . he’s one of the ones with the most to lose. . . [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am
Relying on State v. [read post]
1 May 2016, 1:49 pm
For example Williams v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm
Yesterday, in Berghuis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
In a 1984 case, North Carolina v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 2:34 pm
LSAT v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 5:48 am
The Torture of Sami Al Arian Date Posted: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 [www.masnet.org] PITTSBURG (JURIST) March 11, 2008 - Guest Columnist Peter Erlinder of William Mitchell College of Law, attorney on appeal for Dr. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm
v=e_SIeljZ3Tc), initially broadcasted by the BBC on 26 September 2011 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b015flwq), gathers some of these videos which, after their publication online, allowed the international community to realize the revolt on Syrian streets. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:10 am
For simple protection, you can right click the resulting template files, choose properties, and make them read only so people won’t accidentally over-write them. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:30 am
Alan also has an interesting take on the Brady v. [read post]
