Search for: "People v. Ryan" Results 561 - 580 of 777
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
Ryan) provided a discussion of the state of affairs in class actions. [read post]
20 Dec 2008, 3:00 am
(IP Dragon) Columbia Sportswear successful in reducing counterfeits in China (IP Dragon) Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court orders New Apple Concept Technology to pay Apple 400,000 Yuan in damages for trade mark infringement and unfair competition (DeBund) 2386 IPR cases dealt with by Culture Administrations in Q3 (DeBund) Well-known trade marks can be recognised on basis of the products’ sales volumes (DeBund) Judicial Criteria for copyright cases (part 2) (DeBund)… [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 5:47 am by Elina Saxena
" David Ryan shed light on the Ninth Circuit's en banc decision in the United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 5:38 am by Elina Saxena
” He wrote that “Syria’s refugees are ordinary people who would have preferred to stay at home, or at least stay in any of the neighboring countries where the challenges of integration might have been less, shall we say, challenging” reminding us that “no people this large and diverse can be painted with one stroke unless prejudice is involved. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 7:23 am by William Ford
Supreme Court last cited one of its pieces in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 12:18 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Trump/Ryan/McConnell approach to health care will leave Obamacare in the dustbin of history. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:13 pm by Florian Mueller
The FTC and DOJ's guiding principle these days--including this month's new United States et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The AP has more on the humanitarian costs of the siege, including the 16,000 people displaced from the latest operation. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]