Search for: "People v. Sell" Results 561 - 580 of 5,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2016, 3:59 pm by Michael W. Huseman
" The court then ruled that "all proceeds" traceable drug trafficking are subject to forfeiture, even if they are increased due to a windfall.The People of the State of Illinois v. $35,315 United States Currency, 2016 IL App (4th) 150685. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The majority says that this risk attends any descriptive mark, but not all descriptive terms are comprised of generic components: while one need not use “soft” to sell one’s mattresses, one generally must use mattress to do so. [read post]
18 Aug 2018, 9:27 pm by HowardGutman
— A person may not advertise for sale merchandise, commodities, or service through an advertisement describing the merchandise, commodities, or service: (1) As part of a plan or scheme with the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service at the advertised price; or (2) With the intent not to sell the merchandise, commodity, or service.Typical Cases  Laster v. [read post]
13 May 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
For several years there have been several people who have all tried to sue Google Australia or Google New Zealand or Google UK, perhaps trying to get a local defendant when it is Google Incin America that produces the search results which they complain about. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
  White people say to us—‘This Measure will be for your good. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal today gave judgment in the case of ETK v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 439). [read post]
5 May 2010, 11:04 am by Eric
The plaintiffs sell dietary supplements ("syntrax," whatever that is). [read post]