Search for: "Peoples v. Peoples"
Results 561 - 580
of 72,781
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 6:56 pm
On Friday, September 25, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court denied leave to appeal in People v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:12 pm
At least for people (like me) who neither speak Spanish nor have access to the untranslated version of what the suspect said.To give an example, down here in San Diego, we have a variety of English-language radio stations that (for regulatory and/or tax reasons) are broadcast from Tijuana, and are hence subject to Mexican rules that make the stations occasionally broadcast English-language statements from the Mexican government; e.g., political, agency, anti-corruption,… [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 7:47 am
Jackson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:07 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Lee v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 5:51 pm
In a situation in which there's little doubt as to who did it.Trusting people: Usually very good. [read post]
8 May 2009, 11:36 am
Unless, of course, you're of the belief that the police only lie to "other" people -- never to someone you care about. [read post]
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:08 am
In Martin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 2:31 pm
More for its style rather than its substance (though I think the latter is fine as well).But, as to the former, I like it how Justice Huffman slams -- fairly forcefully -- the various arguments of "the People" (e.g., the deputy AG's) on appeal in a manner that makes it clear that he expects more from the AG's office than existed here and yet avoids being offensive. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 10:54 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
Throughout 2018, new surveillance practices continued to erode the privacy of people in Latin America. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:00 am
In People v. iMergent, Inc., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 20, 2009), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Six) upheld a preliminary injunction prohibiting the defendants from violating the UCL and the Seller Assisted Marketing Plan ("SAMP") Act (Civ. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:09 pm
You can be liable for defaming an individual even if you do not name her.An interesting case is Leopold v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 12:08 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
28 Jul 2024, 3:23 pm
Drawing on its decision in People v. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 3:37 pm
So when they find a dying dog on your patio and a dead dog in your freezer, they get to arrest you, and you can't legitimately complain about the search.Seems so to the Court of Appeal as well.Exigent circumstances aren't just for people. [read post]
18 May 2012, 12:46 pm
See which one you find more persuasive.I'm generally not into people touching my junk. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 8:15 pm
My strong recommendation is nonetheless that you should not let people buy Ecstacy from you through the admittedly expedient means of sending you a text message.Here's one reason why. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:59 pm
Myers, R. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
