Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 561 - 580
of 1,230
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2007, 8:53 pm
., v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:03 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 10:28 pm
Trump v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:37 am
See Larry Harmon Pictures Corp. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Baye v Midland Credit Management, U.S.D.C. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
Baye v Midland Credit Management, U.S.D.C. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:26 am
The case is entitled Kennedy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:47 pm
The District Court in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:04 am
But in some relatively recent decisions, principally Ayotte v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
” There is also great difficulty in creating new international legislation as we cannot legislate down IP protection and harmonization has proved very difficult to achieve, which we can see from European legislation where there has been great change, but little harmonization in this area. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
Has the time come for a horizontal harmonization for notifying and acting on illegal on line content? [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 8:12 am
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-275/06 Promusicae v. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 1:56 pm
” The Court harmonized its holding with the language of the Supreme Court in Stockton Citizens for Sensible Planning v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:57 pm
On February 7, 2011, in Arechiga v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
We harmonized with David’s beautiful music here, and put the decision in perspective here. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:19 pm
For purposes of Sigvaris, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 10:57 am
United States, a recent decision of the Court of International Trade. [read post]
28 Jan 2018, 11:57 am
(2) Is the industrial property authority of a Member State which is entitled to grant a[n] [SPC] required to rectify, of its own motion, the date of expiry of that [SPC] in order to ensure that that certificate complies with the interpretation of the law set out in the judgment of 6 October 2015, Seattle Genetics (C‑471/14, EU:C:2015:659)? [read post]
