Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 561 - 580
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2013, 5:35 am
And in an opinion analysis for this blog, Steve Vladeck observes that “[i]f nothing else, Oxford Health drives home the consequences of [a] trend” in the Court’s jurisprudence to shift more decision making into arbitration – namely “that, even when arbitrators misinterpret arbitration agreements on issues as important as whether the parties consented to class-wide arbitration, there won’t necessarily be anything courts can do to fix it. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am
Steve Vladeck’s comments added to this by pointing to a series of recently decided or argued cases on contractor liability, included the lesser noticed United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
” Writing for PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck argues that, assuming Justice Kagan “is recused from all matters Guantanamo,” the Court won’t overturn the D.C. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am
At Balkinization, Steve Vladeck writes that the D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 5:09 am
At Just Security, Steve Vladeck discusses the Court’s request for the views of the federal government in KBR v. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 4:03 am
Steve Vladeck had this blog’s preview. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 11:38 am
To take a more recent example, Steve Vladeck, a chronic critic of the shadow docket, filed an amicus brief in one of the many United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 4:20 am
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck asks whether “[a]s a normative matter (that is, without regard to historical or doctrinal foundations), … Justice Kennedy’s case against judge-made damages remedies for constitutional violations [is] actually convincing. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck looks at Dalmazzi v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
Steve Vladeck called this week’s ruling “one of the most significant legal victories that the government has obtained to date in the war on terrorism. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:11 am
” At Just Security, Steve Vladeck observes that Hardiman joined an appeals court ruling holding that “non-citizens physically but not lawfully present on U.S. soil are not protected by the Constitution’s Suspension Clause–meaning that they have no constitutional right to judicial review, even if their detention and/or removal from the country is clearly unlawful,” and argues that this position “should provoke questions from the… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
” Briefly: At PrawfsBlawg, Steve Vladeck discusses the split in the circuits over whether the Court’s recent decision in Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 9:03 pm
Law professor Steve Vladeck of the University of Texas at Austin noted that the bigger story behind Justice Thomas’s opinion is that no other member of the Court chose to join him. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:13 am
As Steve Vladeck argues, the NSA debate is not just about the legality of the agency’s actions, but also about whether they are good public policy—which surely depends at least in part on how they affect people internationally, especially our allies. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 2:58 pm
As Steve Vladeck has previously reported for this blog, Vance is seeking several years’ worth of Trump’s tax returns as part of a state grand-jury investigation. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 3:56 am
This blog’s preview came from Steve Vladeck. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
Steve Vladeck covered the argument for this blog. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
Steve Vladeck at PrawfsBlawg addresses the issue of Scalia’s votes in cases for which a decision has not yet been released. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am
Steve Vladeck covered the decision for this blog; other coverage comes from Taylor Brailey of JURIST. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
” In an op-ed at Motherboard, Steve Vladeck discusses Carpenter v. [read post]
