Search for: "Turner v. United States"
Results 561 - 580
of 632
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 6:24 pm
Video 3: Turner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 2:12 pm
Opinion below(7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Docket: 08-769 Title: United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:11 pm
Supp 1395 (1996) was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 5:02 am
Co. v Pace Plumbing Corp., 298 AD2d 146, 147; Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v United States Fid. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:14 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
" Turner v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 1:42 pm
Turner v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:35 am
Redhail and Turner v. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
The United States as intervenor and amicus supports the position of the Holy See with respect to the Holy See's status as a foreign state and the constitutionality of the FSIA. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 am
United States, 361 U.S. 416, 423-24 (1960), overruled on other grounds by Burks v. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 1:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2008, 9:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 4:00 pm
Kushner v. [read post]
20 Sep 2008, 11:24 pm
Graham; AmosGuiora; Samuel V. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 12:12 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 357 (1967); Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, August 25, 2008 United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 2:50 pm
The United States Supreme Court has held that it is unconstitutional to execute insane people who cannot understand why they are being put to death or that their execution is imminent. [read post]
