Search for: "UKSC Blog"
Results 561 - 580
of 618
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2016, 7:12 am
We wrote an Inforrm blog post on the first judgment here. [read post]
16 May 2017, 4:30 pm
The challenge in T The previous system for this was successfully challenged in T [2014] UKSC 35 and it is necessary to look at this before we see the battle lines in the present case. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
Hence, in Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012) [46] Lord Kerr (Lord Phillips, Lady Hale, Lord Clarke and Lord Reed concurring) held: The particular circumstances affecting the individual whose personal data would be revealed on foot of a Norwich Pharmacal Order will always call for close consideration and these may, in some limited instances, displace the interests of the applicant for the disclosure of the… [read post]
13 May 2012, 5:55 am
On 8 to 10 May 2012 the Supreme Court (Lords Hope, Walker, Kerr, Clarke and Dyson) heard Glenn Mulcaire’s appeal against decision that he should provide information to claimants in the phone hacking litigation. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:27 pm
Arguments relating to the concept of public domain and, in particular, analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in PJS v News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26, and privacy law generally, have been expertly dealt with in two previous Inforrm posts from the Brett Wilson Media Law Blog and Rebecca Moosavian. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:26 am
will reveal all – and, fortunately, there is an excellent website where this objective and useful analysis is being done: UKSC | Blog The rest of The Times story is devoted, of course, to the rather shoddy way Jonathan Sumption QC was treated by the ‘powers that be’. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 7:28 am
These types of case will generally be fact-specific, requiring a careful balancing of competing rights; the Court of Appeal’s decision is certainly not a death knell for “fly on the wall” documentaries, like PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd (Rev 1) [2016] UKSC 26 was for the “kiss and tell” tabloid stories. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 3:53 am
We summarise some of the key group litigation areas below: Opt-out claims: The 2021 Supreme Court decision in Lloyd v Google UKSC 2019/0213 applied a more restrictive interpretation of the “opt out” representative action regime set out in CPR 6 than had been applied by the Courts previously. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
Max Mosley has been unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 5:36 pm
In this feature we revisit some older posts which may still be of current interest. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am
On Monday and Tuesday 17 and 18 October 2011 the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Clarke and Dyson) will hear the appeal of the defendant, Times Newspapers, against the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2010] EWCA Civ 804) that the publication of an article on 2 June 2006 was not covered by Reynolds privilege. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
” Mischon de Reya analysed the decision in a blog post. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:37 am
The Panopticon Blog has a piece “Reforming UK data protection laws – the ICO responds” by Anya Proops QC. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurth blog has more information. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 12:55 am
The Evan Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 4:20 pm
This is a Norwich Pharmacal order, named for the case in which it was first granted (see Norwich Pharmacal Co v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1974] AC 133, [1973] UKHL 6 (26 June 1973); see also The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd [2013] 1 All ER 928, [2012] 1 WLR 3333, [2012] UKSC 55 (21 November 2012)), and the Supreme Court has affirmed that it forms part of Irish law (see Megaleasing v Barrett (No 2) [1993] ILRM 497; Ryanair v Unister [2013] IESC 14 (13… [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm
The ICO Blog had a post “Improving mobile phone data extraction practices across the criminal justice system in the UK”. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm
Hunton Andrews Kurth Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “Swiss Game Developer Settles FTC Allegations Over COPPA Safe Harbor Claims”. [read post]
