Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 561 - 580
of 10,388
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
A miscellaneous statement in the application indicated ed that "[t]he 'XXXX' in the mark denotes the unabbreviated name of a state of the United States and Puerto Rico. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 3:42 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 11:14 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has finally held that the mark is generic and not entitled to registration. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 5:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
Today marks the 25th anniversary of the existence of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Cir. 2009).Applicant argued that "aux Etats Unis" would be translated as "to the United States," but the Board found that the phrase could also mean "in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
United States and United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
Case date: 01 June 2022 Case number: No 21-1107 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 3:29 am
It has exported massage chairs to the United States since at least 1968. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm
Developments in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 2:54 am
Greenfield Senior Living, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:05 am
Karkkainen v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
So, provided that absolute and relative grounds serve different purposes -– the protection of (i) a general interest and of (ii) the individual trade mark holder -- the AG stated that the relevant public has only one overall impression of the mark -- but that, for absolute grounds of refusal of registration the focus is on possible connections between the mark or its components and the goods and services covered while, for relative grounds, the focus… [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 4:27 am
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Supreme Court ruled against Intel Corporation in, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. [read post]
