Search for: "Washington v. US et al" Results 561 - 580 of 1,121
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 12:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
The lawsuit in Al-Aulaqi, et al., v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:35 pm by Lyle Denniston
Circuit in May 2010 (Al Maqaleh, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Case No.: 6:07-cv-839-Orl-35-KRS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et. al., Respondents. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:44 am by Steve Vladeck
According to various media reports, General Stanley McChrystal suggested late last month that the United States should bring back the draft if it goes to war again, arguing that the costs of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have not been adequately spread across different segments of the U.S. population… Without delving into the merits of General McChrystal’s remarks as a policy matter, they present a useful opportunity to reflect on one of the most significant Supreme Court… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 10:30 pm
Federal tax is generally levied on such things as income, investment income and the consumption of certain goods like alcohol, gasoline guzzling cars, telephones, duck stamps, et. al. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Today’s decision should have vindicated, should have taught, this truth; instead, our judgment today has disregarded it.link to case NATIONAL FEDERATION OF INDEPENDENT BUSINESS ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:46 pm by lawmrh
Supremes on Arizona’s illegal immigration SB 1070 in the case known officially as 11-182 Arizona et al. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 3:24 pm by Steve Davies
Edward Markey (D-Mass.) defended the practice of using citizen suits to hold the government accountable. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers et al.Reply of petitioner Swanson v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-591Issue(s): When the government has compelled individuals to make potentially incriminating statements, whether prosecutors’ subsequent use of those statements in deciding to indict those individuals violates the Fifth Amendment’s Self-Incrimination Clause and the use immunity principles of Kastigar v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:15 pm by Matthew Bush
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Los Angeles County Police Chiefs' Association et al. [read post]