Search for: "Doe 35" Results 5781 - 5800 of 17,236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2016, 8:37 am by Quinta Jurecic
Security Council resolution condemning the construction of further Israeli settlements in the West Bank (on which the United States had previously intended to abstain), and suggested that the Pentagon scrap the longrunning Lockheed Martin contract for F-35 stealth aircraft. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 7:10 am by John Jascob
Eastman added that it would also be possible to assemble a group of 20 shareholders that own at least 3 percent of its common shares that does not include any of its largest 90 institutional shareholders. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:22 am by Jani Ihalainen
Again, the rejection of the applications concerned the naming of DABUS as the inventor of the inventions, which, according to the UKIPO, does not fulfill the requirements of the UK legislation for registration. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
The United States, however, has enacted a provision that deals with inventions in space, specifically 35 USC 105. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:33 pm
Patent Application 10/378,261 (Mar. 3, 2003) (the “’261 application”) under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 12:54 am by Mark Summerfield
  This suggests to me that the Patent Office is continuing to grapple with the principles of patent-eligibility set out in Research Affiliates, RPL Central, and D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35, and that applicants therefore still cannot expect predictable or consistent outcomes as examiners endeavour to apply these principles on a case-by-case basis. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
McCain, 78 F.3d 540 (CAFC 1996):Because patented before Lamb-Weston's invention, the references disclosed to the patent examiner were prior art under section 102(a) of title 35. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 3:10 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Idiotically formalistic though this might be, I viewed it as just deserts for the formalistic legal norm that income must be taxed only once, a norm under which being taxed ten times at a 1% rate each time would be a horrid injustice, whereas being taxed once at 35% would be unobjectionable.However, Fadi Shaheen, in a message that he has authorized me to quote (I don't otherwise spill the beans here on private communications), says the following:"1. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 7:22 am by John Jascob
for failing to properly inform investors about a cybersecurity breach, which resulted in a $35 million settlement. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 6:07 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See Ex parte Ohsaka, 2 USPQ2d 1460, 1461 (BPAI 1987).Within the concurring opinion:As to obviousness under 35 USC 103:I concur with the majority Decision to reverse the obviousness rejection, but on a different basis. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:06 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Nor does a defendant waive objections to jurisdiction by the participation of someone not authorized to represent the party, the Court found. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:01 am
Minutes of the oral proceedings - here.The technical board of appeal (TBA)'s position is unequivocal: the AC does not have the power to amend the EPC using the Rules. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:34 am by Camilla Hrdy
In other words, what counts as prior art against a patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:04 pm
The tax credit can be worth up to 50% of an employer's contribution toward employees' premium costs, and up to 35% for tax-exempt employers. [read post]