Search for: "Strong v. United States"
Results 5781 - 5800
of 6,650
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jul 2023, 8:05 am
And, because “not all blacks in the United States were former slaves,” “ ‘freedman’ ” was a decidedly underinclusive proxy for race. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
" (Recommendation p. 10).If that is what the Ethics Council is suggesting, it presents an interesting and useful application of the 2nd Pillar of the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (corporate responsibility to respect human rights) to enterprises independent of their legal obligations under the more formally legal 2st Pillar state duty to protect human rights. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:53 am
Or, at least, that was the status quo until 2010, the year of the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
Stegall (5th Cir. 1981); United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
Individual plaintiffs in Florida can win $100,000 by arguing that a notice is not sufficiently “precise and thorough,” which provides a strong incentive to litigate early and often. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 8:22 am
A strong majority of the judges – including Sarah Cleveland (United States), Xue Hanqin (China), Leonardo Nemer Caldeira Brant (Brazil), Georg Nolte (Germany), and Dire Tladi (South Africa) – voted in favor of each of these holdings. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
The plaintiffs agree with Congress that there is a strong public interest in stopping sex trafficking. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:30 am
Indeed, we are only beginning to get a glimpse of how truly terrible it may turn out to be....The United States is, I believe, in the most precarious position since 1860.... [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
: (Dilanchian), The three dysfunctions of a complex IP legal team: (IP Law360), IP litigation and WIPO: (Ezine @rticles), Time to nominate IP Hall of Fame inductees: (IAM), Product packaging and patent protection: (IP Law360), Understanding the value of IPRs in the context of fashion and visual arts: (Ezine @articles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands How logos, shapes and colours are remembered: (Class 46), Now obsolete .su (Soviet Union) domains still going… [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 3:28 pm
I think it does become part of the political -- you would then have the Citizens United decision, the Bush v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 11:50 am
He also "has expressed a very strong tendency to protect the prerogatives of the judiciary," as in Bank Markazi v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
United States, involves application of the federal Sentencing Guidelines to a person being resentenced. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 4:59 am
As the Court stated in Terry v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
A number of states have changed their legislation to include this exception to the double jeopardy rule, including Ireland, Denmark, Germany, and of course the United Kingdom. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:15 pm
” Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
In the course of this work I encountered Section 1905 in the following way.There was, and still is, a federal law on the books enacted in 2007 called the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act that mandates that important information from the majority of significant clinical trials run in the United States be published on the National Institute of Health (NIH) website. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 10:24 am
For starters, the claim that an organization can claim standing because there is a strong statistical probability that some of its members will suffer an injury from a government action has been expressly considered and rejected by the Supreme Court in prior cases, most notably Summers v. [read post]
