Search for: "In re Hill"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 7,562
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
That will send the message to local leaders they're on notice. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
But Trump is saying, no, you're the fascists. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 3:40 pm
It’s the Supreme Court we’re talking about here, so there was a fair amount of arguing back and forth, but to make a long story at least somewhat shorter, the bottom-line is that he won… Cuomo did it! [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 9:56 am
We're fucked.But the damn judge. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 2:28 pm
Bearing the GAO’s warning in mind, the data we do have doesn’t remotely seem to justify the DEFCON One rhetoric that now appears to be obligatory on the Hill. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:55 am
Road Test or Education Program: Once you’re ready, the next step is to demonstrate your riding skills through a road test. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 10:01 am
Even if the security camera catches your face, you’re fine. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 12:30 am
The best law firm website designs are easy to navigate, with strong branding, loads of helpful content, and make it easy for visitors to find what they’re looking for. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
Can you imagine the immediate impact on Arizona’s economy, even if only if 50 percent of the state’s homeowners were paying a third less each month than they’re paying now, and were no longer hopelessly underwater? [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:07 am
They’re jeans. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:51 am
They’re not new. [read post]
18 May 2008, 9:28 am
"They're all in the same boat. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 11:14 am
And that was denied Jews in Kansas city, and that was denied Muslims in Chapel Hill and Sikhs in Oak Creek. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:48 am
Prizes It's not every day that you're randomly picked from among 87,000 peers. [read post]
19 May 2010, 5:17 am
Hill, Anticipatory Obstruction of Justice, 89 Cornell Law Review 1519 (2004)]). [read post]
20 Sep 2024, 12:30 pm
Fifth Circuit: Perhaps, but we're gonna affirm because Sharpe was either expressing opinion or just relying on "publicly known facts. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 2:41 pm
My point is, unless you’re pretty damn confident you’re going to successfully overthrow the government, and these idiots had zero chance of that, you probably shouldn’t make it easy to identify yourself while trying to do so. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:15 pm
The fact that the outsourcing of patent searches and the preparation of patent applications violates U.S. law only makes perfect sense, particularly when you factor into consideration the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 181 (re: national security) and 35 U.S.C. 184 (re: foreign filing licenses). [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 11:38 pm
If the New York Times rejects an op ed I submit, and I end up publishing it in The Hill or the Boston Globe (such things have actually happened to me!) [read post]
