Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 19,222
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 7:35 pm
On July 15, 2011, in Turner and Jones v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 1:45 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
King v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 1:15 pm
He stated that if his request were denied, he would seek to waive counsel and represent himself. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:04 pm
But it nonetheless remains a fairly funky way of saying it.Anyway, having joined the Court of Appeal only last year, Justice Wiley is quickly making his mark, if only as a matter of writing style. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
The unit’s occupant had paid his past due balance weeks before the sale, but the system incorrectly listed the unit as delinquent and marked it to be sold. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 2:02 am
Haritatos v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
Maryland, supra (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
15 May 2010, 5:21 pm
Fair Isaac Corp. v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:46 am
State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 3:25 pm
Apr. 4, 2008), the court affirmed the district court's rejection of laches and acquiescence defenses on the facts in the case because it found progressive encroachment (the defendant had recently greatly expanded its use of plaintiff's mark in plaintiff's territory) and resulting inevitable confusion.The Angel Flight court also held that if a person falsely states in a section 1(a) affidavit that no other person has the right to use the mark, but knows that… [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:30 pm
Thursday, March 28, marked the last day of the 2013 legislative session, one of the most successful on record for the State Bar of Georgia. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 3:10 pm
THALER v. [read post]
30 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
State v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:06 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm
Citing Mark Foy's Limited v Davies Coop and Company Limited (1956) 95 CLR 190 - "The public...are being invited to purchase goods of the defendant which are to be distinguished from the goods of other traders partly because they are described as "Tub Happy" goods. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 2:07 pm
& Care Home v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
DeVry Inc. v. [read post]
