Search for: "Thomas v. State"
Results 5801 - 5820
of 15,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 12:34 pm
Trump (4th Cir.) and Hawaii v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:52 am
This consequence for state legislatures formed the backbone of Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent in Graham v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:12 am
Instead, for a 5-4 majority, Justice Clarence Thomas concluded in Davila v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:18 am
Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch wrote separately to say that they did not, and that they wanted to overrule Locke v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:09 am
Answer (from the US Supreme Court in Davila v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
The government, relying on the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Kleindienst v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 7:59 pm
On its face, Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:56 pm
” Finally, Roberts – joined by Thomas, Gorsuch, and Justice Samuel Alito – dissented from the court’s decision to send the case of Johnson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 4:17 pm
The justices declined to take up the case of Peruta v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 3:13 pm
” Justice Neil Gorsuch’s dissent (joined by Justice Clarence Thomas) would permit state funds to subsidize such religious activities if they were awarded on the basis of religion-neutral criteria. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm
RFRA (Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:33 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 1:23 pm
Justice Clarence Thomas wrote separately to indicate that, in his view, the Hernandez family could not rely on Bivens at all. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
The chief justice announces that Thomas has the opinion for the court in Davila v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:24 pm
As Haig v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 11:19 am
In Pavan v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
In Locke v. [read post]
