Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 13,871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 12:40 pm
In today’s case (Slater v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 pm
Norman Timberlake v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d at 1136; see generally Matter of Albany Police Officers Union, Local 2841, Law Enforcement Officers Union Dist. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d at 1136; see generally Matter of Albany Police Officers Union, Local 2841, Law Enforcement Officers Union Dist. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d at 1136; see generally Matter of Albany Police Officers Union, Local 2841, Law Enforcement Officers Union Dist. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:00 am
School Dist., 21 AD3d at 1136; see generally Matter of Albany Police Officers Union, Local 2841, Law Enforcement Officers Union Dist. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
In James Meyers v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 7:08 am
Bedoya v. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Longshoreman's Assn., AFL-CIO v New York City Dept. of Transp., 35 AD3d 211, rejected this argument, explaining that the City's safety concerns, "albeit important, are not 'embodied in constitutional, statutory or common law [that] prohibit a particular matter from being decided or certain relief from being granted by an arbitrator.'" The court also rejected City's claim that its action was consistent with its "management prerogative pursuant… [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Longshoreman's Assn., AFL-CIO v New York City Dept. of Transp., 35 AD3d 211, rejected this argument, explaining that the City's safety concerns, "albeit important, are not 'embodied in constitutional, statutory or common law [that] prohibit a particular matter from being decided or certain relief from being granted by an arbitrator.'" The court also rejected City's claim that its action was consistent with its "management prerogative pursuant… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
It was one of the key motivating factors for the organization of the conservative legal movement itself and for the founding of the Federalist Society for Law and Public Policy Studies.[3]As I and others have shown in previous scholarship, the Reagan administration’s preoccupation with dismantling the administrative state has been documented through primary accounts and interviews with Reagan era lawyers,[4]archival evidence from the Reagan Library and Office of… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:48 am
My Law Office is located at 726 West Saint Georges [W. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:11 am
During her tenure in the solicitor general's office, she argued 12 cases at the Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 11:45 am
Be careful, as we have reported in the past, in a case entitled People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 3:12 pm
However, in Holder v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
McClure v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 12:24 pm
One need not even mention Bush v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument on Armour, et al., v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 4:56 pm
The Court thought the fact that the office was shared with a few other individuals to be of no constitutional distinction. [read post]
