Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5821 - 5840
of 9,848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2013, 7:12 am
Here, the proposed protective order would not protect disclosure of records generated by a court of the United States. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 12:16 pm
See Wayte v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am
Because racial groups have never been similarly situated in the United States, any way of structuring a political process will confer differential benefits and burdens on different races. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Hearsay is not allowed as evidence in the United States, unless one of [a number of] exceptions applies to the particular statement being made. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:18 am
Troy District Judge Kirsten Nielsen Hartig has ruled that Michigan's motor vehicle code provision criminalizing the operation of a motor vehicle with the presence of a controlled substance [marijuana] violates the equal protection clause of the Michigan and United States Constitutions.The case, People v Sulaka, arose in 2010 when the accused was allegedly speeding and, when pulled-over, could not produce a drivers license. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
In Newdow v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 2:00 am
James-Frederick v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 10:26 am
Gulf States Reorganization Group v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 9:26 am
Gulf States Reorganization Group v. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 4:05 am
Thro, Undermining Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 10:28 am
Under the Lanham Act, a federal law, the holder of a mark may ask the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark on the principal register. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 9:16 am
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am
California and United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 8:18 pm
This does not mean the alternative forum needs to have the same safe guards or remedies as a United States courts. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 10:55 am
” United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:08 pm
United States regarding affirmative defenses. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 12:07 pm
This much needed (and much anticipated) guidance is in response to the recent United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:38 pm
Rule 23(b)(3) does not impose such a heavy burden." [read post]
