Search for: "FIELDS v. STATE"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 11,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2012, 6:59 am
--Court: Supreme Court of IndianaOpinion Date: 3/21/12Cite: Loparex, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 11:58 am
Goodman v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:33 am
As I noted in The Third Circuit's 1:1 Punitive Damages Ruling: The Lingering Complications of State Farm v. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 6:15 am
Here are a few examples: AHRI v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
In the end, the Moody v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 11:22 am
In the end, the Moody v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 10:35 am
Link: Ohio v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 5:43 pm
Recently, a state appellate court issued a hard-to-swallow opinion in an Arizona drug possession case. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 pm
State Hwy 161, Irving, TX, 75039. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 9:54 am
(The Supreme Court agrees to some extent: see U.S. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 8:40 am
The pilots allege a long history of discriminatory behavior on behalf of United across multiple U.S. states. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:45 am
Gonzalez v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Historically, both proponents and opponents of the enrollment multiplier have sought a level playing field, but the arguments are strikingly adverse. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 6:38 pm
A DWI defendant recently appealed the denial of her motion to suppress in State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:24 am
(See Brescia v. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 11:24 am
(See Brescia v. [read post]
