Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 5841 - 5860
of 7,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2025, 12:05 pm
United States A federal judge has dismissed Richard Montañez’s lawsuit for defamation and fraud against PepsiCo and Frito-Lay for denying his role in inventing Flamin’ Hot Cheetos. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Supp. 547, 556–57 (E.D.N.C. 1995) (ruling that an expert witness may opine about comparisons between boat engines in rough water but only as a lay witness, because the comparison tests were unreliable, with a high estimated rate of error) FIFTH CIRCUIT Albert v. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 3:02 am
March 23, 2016), and Barcal v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
9 May 2011, 11:17 am
Act') lays down the manner in which gift of immoveable property may be effected. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:01 am
There are two meaty things to note about the opinion in Perry v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
The proof problems for expert witnesses are differentially greater than they are with lay witnesses. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 12:45 pm
After 12 years on Texas’s death row, Anthony Graves was exonerated. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board set out its preliminary opinion that the invention did not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).V. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 12:00 am
The admissibility of the appealIn view of the facts set out at points I, V and VI above, the board finds that the appeal satisfies the admissibility criteria under the EPC and is thus admissible.2. [read post]
28 May 2020, 2:28 pm
Third and last, I will lay out a strawman “duty of care” for more detailed discussion in a later post. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:18 am
The ECtHR handed down judgement in Marcinkevicius v Lithuania (Application no. 24919/20) on 15 November 2022. [read post]
8 May 2018, 11:21 am
Lay of the land Activity at oral argument is not as straightforward as one might surmise. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
Perry Homes v Cull. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:34 pm
” Byrne v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
