Search for: "Small v. People" Results 5841 - 5860 of 8,519
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2012, 12:44 am by Steve Davies
§§ 1361-1421, by issuing an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) that authorizes Apache to repeatedly take beluga whales in their critical habitat, despite the fact that the MMPA limits such authorizations to “small numbers of marine mammals of a species or population stock,” requires no more than a “negligible impact” on species and stocks, and forbids “an unmitigatable adverse impact on the availability of such species or stock for taking for… [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:46 am by Rosalind English
Mcgrath v Dawkins, Amazon and others [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) -read judgment In an interesting ruling on a strike-out action against a libel claim, a High Court judge has delineated the scope for defamation in blog posts and discussion threads where the audience is small and the libel limited. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm by Ariel Katz
The court found that making small free excerpts from these books available to students would further the spread of knowledge, that copying caused no harm to the sale of any of the plaintiff’s books, and that here was no reason to believe that allowing unpaid, nonprofit academic use of small excerpts in controlled circumstances would diminish creation of academic works, or would appreciably diminish the Plaintiffs' ability to publish high quality scholarly books. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
MAYOR BLOOMBERG LAUNCHES NATION'S LARGEST PUBLIC AD CAMPAIGN TO FIGHT CHRONIC ABSENTEEISM AND ANNOUNCES NEW RESOURCES TO HELP PARENTS IMPROVE STUDENT ATTENDANCE Latest Data Indicate Strong Response to Anti-Truancy Measures in Pilot Schools: Students with Mentors Gained 11,820 More Days of School This Year City Resources - Including New York, Brooklyn and Queens Public Library Systems - to Help Parents Keep Students on Track   Last week, Mayor Michael R. [read post]
13 May 2012, 4:46 pm by Lawrence Higgins
But even if it's just treated as symbolic expression, it is still constitutionally protected, as cases such as Texas v. [read post]
13 May 2012, 2:33 pm by Richard Posner
  In 1967 the Supreme Court, in a case called Loving v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am by Patrick Quinlan
The people who founded our country, and those who then wrote the Florida Constitution, were very afraid of some small group of people gaining too much power and using that power to control our government and the fate of We the People. [read post]
10 May 2012, 11:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  You don’t want to incentivize people to opt into a small claims process because it’s cheaper to deal with it than to fight. [read post]