Search for: "State v. Wall" Results 5841 - 5860 of 6,627
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2009, 8:05 am
The fine line between hedging and speculation    For those not familiar with the derivatives market, the word “derivatives” is synonymous with corporate scandals, Wall Street opulence, or highly risky investments that often lead to bankruptcy. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Meanwhile the Wall Street Journal and the Washington Post are reporting that Google hid the Google+ API defect from shareholders and others for fear of regulatory examination, Congressional inquiry and other negative ramifications. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am by Mandelman
  It sort of leaves you sitting there staring at the wall unsure of what to do next. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am by INFORRM
To rely on the defence, the defendant must show, first, that that there is a real public interest in communicating and receiving the information (Jameel v Wall Street Journal [2006] UKHL 44 [147], Baroness Hale). [read post]
24 May 2020, 7:38 am by Cyberleagle
” (Q.554) (emphasis added)The Consequence: It is difficult to reconcile the desire of the Secretary of State to erect “hard walls”, in order to avoid unintended consequences, with the government’s apparent determination to leave the notion of harm undefined, delegating to the regulator the task of deciding what counts as harmful. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
” Chief Justice Roberts then moved on to Justice Kagan.Cards Close to the Vest: Questioning by Justices Gorsuch and KavanaughMuch has been made of the fact that President Trump’s appointees, Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh, did not agree in Bostock v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 7:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
In drug cases, though, Congress and the courts change all the rules: in most states you can’t even argue the drug maker was negligent, you can only argue the drug maker didn’t warn you that they were negligent. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:24 am by Beatrice Yahia
State Department spokesperson said. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 7:38 am by frank_bennett
Too familiar, perhaps, as most of us now rely on content supplied through walled gardens for much of our research work. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:30 am by Michael Scutt
  Facebook states that 35 million users update their status everyday, 50% of all active users log into Facebook every day and 3 billion photos are uploaded each month. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm by Ailyn Cabico
The lack of this exception in the proposed rule constitutes a material adverse business risk to state-registered fund advisers, a serious competitive detriment to our investors, and sets an unlevel playing field that threatens to limit the development and availability of private, state-registered fund management in states that adopt this rule. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:44 am by Broc Romanek
The case is Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System v. [read post]