Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 5881 - 5900
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2013, 10:24 am
In New York, possession of a firearm is a criminal act, unless one holds a license to so possess, pursuant to Penal Law § 265.20(a)(3) and Article 400 (see People v Abdullah, 23 Misc 3d 232 [2008]; People v Zabar Lynch, 2008 NY Misc LEXIS 4587, 240 NYLJ 15 (July 15, 2008). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 9:36 pm
TVI Energy Corp. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The Court of Appeal was heavily critical of the suggestion that a claim may dip in and out of actionability. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The Court of Appeal was heavily critical of the suggestion that a claim may dip in and out of actionability. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 4:15 pm
The Court of Appeal was heavily critical of the suggestion that a claim may dip in and out of actionability. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 4:01 pm
In People v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 10:47 am
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 8:16 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:07 am
But, to be very clear, there are some people who sided with Google on this question whom I respect a great deal. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 7:23 am
It may well be that the Supreme Court’s recent decisions will crush the agency’s efforts between the rock of Loper Bright and the hard (look) place of Ohio v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 4:25 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 12:05 pm
Even if your initial impression may be the exact opposite.Something to remember. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 12:46 pm
It may well not change your mind. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 8:12 am
To set the stage, Epic v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 2:16 pm
Moore v. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:00 am
In People v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm
Unequal land: Towards full recognition of Indigenous people’s religious rights. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
International Justice, Wild West v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:48 am
People should strongly consider government actions to restrict the internet, even if they are merely persuasive. [read post]