Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 5881 - 5900 of 10,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Jay of Goodwin Procter LLP’s Washington, D.C., office, with twenty-five  minutes of time. [read post]
28 May 2010, 12:27 pm by Bexis
.**************   As many of you know, earlier this week, the United States Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General (or for now Acting Solicitor General) to "express the view of the United States" in the Mensing case (Supreme Court Nos. 09-993, 09-1039, 588 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
Scobie stated that he had not included the names to comply with libel laws and asserted that the allegations had been printed in error. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926) claimed that the Supreme Court should not treat as an important precedent the Tenure of Office Act of 1867 because everyone knew Reconstruction was a time in which Republicans were engaged in pure politics. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:11 am by Jay Willis
Also at the Sentencing Law Blog, Berman examines the question that the Court certified to the Montana Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 4:45 am by Marcia Coyle
United States, the justices will decide if Idaho’s Defense of Life Act is “pre-empted,” or blocked, because it conflicts with the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act. [read post]
22 Aug 2024, 9:05 am by Little West
 Other states, including California, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, and Washington, are considering additional AI restrictions. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 1:02 pm by WIMS
" There were no cosponsors to the bill which was referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, Chaired by Representative Henry Waxman (D-CA).On April 2, 2007, the United States Supreme Court, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a case involving flood damage allegedly resulting from the government’s failure to protect the banks of a canal in Louisiana from erosion, and make clear that “when the government, whether through action or inaction, takes private property, it has a distinct, well-established responsibility to compensate landowners. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the justices held that SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” under the appointments clause, who have to be appointed by the president, a court or a department head; they predict “interesting times ahead for the Administrative State. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 6:53 am by Josh Blackman
Throughout the trial, Jefferson frequently wrote to George Hay, the United States Attorney, with precise instructions on how to manage the case. [read post]