Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 5901 - 5920
of 13,693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2013, 10:47 am
You don’t pay unless you’re happy with our work. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
If you let your temper get the best of you, you’re not alone. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 9:55 am
(See, e.g., Homkow v. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 4:43 am
E.g., what do they have against the Waco court? [read post]
17 May 2015, 10:13 am
In some cases (e.g., new drugs and medical devices), we’ve decided that the risks of such innovations require that they be carefully introduced into small populations, and their safety and efficacy measured, before they’re introduced into the general population. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:05 am
E.g., "How's Dave doing? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 9:52 am
Conservatives... liberals... they're all journalists! [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:37 am
Before drafting an employment contract for your client, gather all relevant information, e.g. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 3:30 am
Here is Andrew Wallender’s recap Bloomberg Law: The Barstool Sports controversy began after [Barstool Sports President, Dave Portnoy] re-posted a 2015 article where he said he would “smash” any employee union effort. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:15 pm
I also think the timing of the holidays plays in here as well as other unique circumstances: e.g., did the candidate have a long-standing wedding/honeymoon planned? [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:00 am
But doctors aren't supposed to be bean counters; they're supposed to give their patients the best care regardless of the cost. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
The case is entitled In re: Enterprise Rent-A-Car Wage & Hour Employment Practices Litigation. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:20 pm
Pediatric patients under the age of 18 who have a 10-year maximum or until the age of 20 ½ (e.g. a 3-year-old has until age 13 and a 16-year-old has until 20 ½). [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 6:48 pm
Kraut is a Harvard Law School educated ex-prosecutor, and he regularly consults with major media (e.g. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:31 pm
Lawyers do not re-invent wheels. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 3:30 am
So, if you’re clutching your pearls hoping that a layperson jury grasps the distinction between “but for/because of” and any causation standard, clutch real hard. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:06 pm
Still, the kids at the party had fun, and we're looking forward to hosting the 3d Annual with our friends at Co-Op next time in NYC. [read post]
31 May 2009, 1:04 pm
I hope they're correct, but I don't share their implicit optimism about what is possible within unreformed political institutions. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:55 am
The text goes on to list the types of purchasers, e.g., relatives, spouses, corporations, etc. that are excluded from the count of 25 purchasers, and ends with two tests for determining whether separate securities issuances can be integrated into the offering.* The statutory isolated nonissuer exemption was further explained by a new rule defining "isolated" as "standing alone, detached, or separate as opposed to repeated or successive," and "nonissuer… [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:30 am
If, for example, an employer extends leave to new mothers beyond the period of recuperation from childbirth (e.g. to provide the mothers time to bond with and/or care for the baby), it cannot lawfully fail to provide an equivalent amount of leave to new fathers for the same purpose. [read post]
