Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 5901 - 5920 of 20,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 8:13 am by Stefanie Levine
  Judge Lourie states “[v]isualization does not cleave and isolate the particular DNA; that is the act of human invention. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 10:07 am by Holly
  In May, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) redefined the test for nonobviousness [LKQ Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:14 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider what kind of proof is required to secure an enhanced prison sentence for a drug dealer whose customer died after ingesting the drug. [read post]
24 Dec 2019, 3:12 pm
A young lawyer named John Roberts spearheaded this effort, so it is no surprise that, as chief justice of the United States, he has helped enshrine this warped conception of the FAA into law. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:49 pm
No. 15), the Court announced they changed the test to conform with the 2006 United States Supreme Court case Brigham City v. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am by Lauren Valkenaar (US)
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am by Lauren Valkenaar (US)
Procedural History We have been following the critical twists and turns of this litigation which began in 2008 and included a trip to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 9:27 pm by Sean Wajert
M/V Ya Mawlaya, 99 F.3d 717, 722 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Humanitarian Law Project seems to reject this: United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:01 pm
FIFA, the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the governing body of football, has long contended that players should be released to play with their national teams. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2011) (noting that to carry its burden under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the pa- tentee must sufficiently “tie the expert testimony on damages to the facts of the case”).As to the injunction:Yet, the injunction states that SAP “shall not (a) charge to or accept payment of software maintenance from that customer with respect to any of the Infringing Products in the United States; or (b) license or sell any new ‘seats’ or otherwise charge… [read post]