Search for: "People v. Part" Results 5901 - 5920 of 25,286
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:22 pm by The Complex Litigator
If the plain, commonsense meaning of a statute's words is unambiguous, the plain meaning controls.' " (People v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:41 am
While Congress has bickered and blathered, the least democratic branch has done much of the work of the people, stepping in with a series of landmark patent rulings that have undermined the excessive clout wielded by patent holders, with rulings that strip them of the automatic right to shut down their rivals' businesses when they infringe (eBay v MercExchange, 2006) and tighten the standard for proving that an invention deserves patent protection in the first place (KSR… [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:11 pm by Jon Sands
At sentencing, counsel filed a motion under People v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:43 am
App. 1998) (a search of a student by a school resource officer must be justified at its inception, and the search must be reasonably related in scope to the reason for the search); People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 1:00 pm
I've now had a chance to review the complaint in Van Etten v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 1:56 am
The article is an offshoot of a speech Steve recently gave for JP Morgan (Hong Kong) and it is entitled "Danone v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:26 am by shirley
This is part 4 of a series of posts about the new Companies Act. [read post]