Search for: "State v. Battle"
Results 5901 - 5920
of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 11:20 am
Many of the cases which outlined the requirements of impartial investigation (like the Jordan case cited above, but including McKerr v United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, Kelly and Others v United Kingdom, no. 30054/96 and Shanaghan v United Kingdom, no. 37715/97) involved the UK directly (and particularly its security operations in Northern Ireland). [read post]
21 May 2009, 3:27 am
" They say "The State of Georgia v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
In Capital v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 1:48 pm
This is precisely what happened in West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
This is only the third case to reach the Supreme Court involving the limits of the right to free elections in A3P1 (the first was R (Barclay & Ors) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKSC 9, on election law on the island of Sark; the second was the unsuccessful challenge to the UK’s prisoner voting ban in R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice and McGeoch v Lord President of the Council [2013] UKSC 63). [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 5:36 pm
& Mfrs. of Am. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
See, e.g., Ormandy v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 9:01 pm
In an early case, Willingham v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm
In my submissions on Bill 184 to the Standing Committee on Social Policy I stated, 64. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
"Marbury v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 7:45 am
Image by Shirley v. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
Further, that an administration headed by two men who had "had other priorities" than to risk their own lives when their turn to fight for their country came up, should brand as a threat to the United States a person who did not run away but stood up and fought for his country and was wounded in battle, goes beyond the outrageous. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 11:21 pm
Intellectual Property Law is a complicated area of law, yet high profile copyright, patent, and trademark cases have caught the public's imagination and intellectual property law is now a niche topic in mainstream news reporting.The recent Samsung v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:00 am
This is not a machine v. human battle. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
As the decision of the AAR in Ikea Trading v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 9:26 am
CRST Van Expedited, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 3:00 am
The legislation requires services providers to register with the State Bar and pay a fee. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 4:11 pm
In Espenscheid et al. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 10:02 pm
I will begin this post with a brief backgrounder from Wikipedia:Loving v. [read post]
